<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCGS Error On Slabs from WTC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wtc911coins.com/1099/pcgs-error-on-slabs-from-wtc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wtc911coins.com/1099/pcgs-error-on-slabs-from-wtc/</link>
	<description>WTC Recovered coins from ground zero at the World Trade Center, September 11, 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.wtc911coins.com/1099/pcgs-error-on-slabs-from-wtc/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtc911coins.com/?p=1099#comment-421</guid>
		<description>One further comment.  I see definite evidence that there are 1000 &quot;1 of 1000&quot; PCGS sets, each consisting of a 2001 MS69 $1 Silver Eagle and a 1999 MS69 $5 Gold eagle.  There are two separate consecutive 1000 certificate # runs (bulk submissions?) that support this as follows:

Qty 500 2001 MS69 $1 Silver Eagles
 Cert #&#039;s: 71231974-71232473
Qty 500 1999 MS69 $5 Gold Eagles
 Cert #&#039;s: 71232474-71232973

AND

Qty 500 2001 MS69 $1 Silver Eagles
 Cert #&#039;s: 71239453-71239952
Qty 500 2001 MS69 $1 Gold Eagles
 Cert #&#039;s: 71239953-71240452

There are also in existence as indicated from the photo above additional &quot;Collectors Universe/Gem Uncirculated&quot; $1 Siver Eagles, marked &quot;1 of 1000&quot; on the flag label.  Has anyone found examples of $5 Gold Eagles in CU/GU slabs marked &quot;1 of 1000&quot;?  At this point I&#039;m guessing not.

I think the &quot;1 of 1000&quot; CU/GU $1 Silver Eagles are an additional &quot;1 of 1000&quot; single coin &#039;set&#039;.

Please post a reply if you have info to shed more light on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One further comment.  I see definite evidence that there are 1000 &#8220;1 of 1000&#8243; PCGS sets, each consisting of a 2001 MS69 $1 Silver Eagle and a 1999 MS69 $5 Gold eagle.  There are two separate consecutive 1000 certificate # runs (bulk submissions?) that support this as follows:</p>
<p>Qty 500 2001 MS69 $1 Silver Eagles<br />
 Cert #&#8217;s: 71231974-71232473<br />
Qty 500 1999 MS69 $5 Gold Eagles<br />
 Cert #&#8217;s: 71232474-71232973</p>
<p>AND</p>
<p>Qty 500 2001 MS69 $1 Silver Eagles<br />
 Cert #&#8217;s: 71239453-71239952<br />
Qty 500 2001 MS69 $1 Gold Eagles<br />
 Cert #&#8217;s: 71239953-71240452</p>
<p>There are also in existence as indicated from the photo above additional &#8220;Collectors Universe/Gem Uncirculated&#8221; $1 Siver Eagles, marked &#8220;1 of 1000&#8243; on the flag label.  Has anyone found examples of $5 Gold Eagles in CU/GU slabs marked &#8220;1 of 1000&#8243;?  At this point I&#8217;m guessing not.</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;1 of 1000&#8243; CU/GU $1 Silver Eagles are an additional &#8220;1 of 1000&#8243; single coin &#8216;set&#8217;.</p>
<p>Please post a reply if you have info to shed more light on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.wtc911coins.com/1099/pcgs-error-on-slabs-from-wtc/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtc911coins.com/?p=1099#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll be the first to admit this gets more baffling by the minute.  I found another MS69 Silver eagle from the 1 of 1000 series with a PCGS number outside the previously mentioned 500 coin &quot;cert range&quot; (71239453-71239952).  This one is # 71232364, and as it turns out falls within ANOTHER 500 coin range (71231974-71232473)!  All of these 1000 coins are 2001 MS69 $1 silver eagles.  I have found examples from each range slabbed as 1 of 1000 WTC coins.

Dilemma:  There appear to be 1000 (discrete cert number) MS69 coins labeled as 1 of 1000, yet there are also Collector&#039;s Universe/Gem Uncirculated 2001 Silver Eagles slabbed as 1 of 1000 coins.  Conclusion?  Could there be TWO separate 1 of 1000 sets?!! (one with PCGS MS69 slabbed coins and one with Collectors Universe/Gem Uncirculated slabbed coins?)

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll be the first to admit this gets more baffling by the minute.  I found another MS69 Silver eagle from the 1 of 1000 series with a PCGS number outside the previously mentioned 500 coin &#8220;cert range&#8221; (71239453-71239952).  This one is # 71232364, and as it turns out falls within ANOTHER 500 coin range (71231974-71232473)!  All of these 1000 coins are 2001 MS69 $1 silver eagles.  I have found examples from each range slabbed as 1 of 1000 WTC coins.</p>
<p>Dilemma:  There appear to be 1000 (discrete cert number) MS69 coins labeled as 1 of 1000, yet there are also Collector&#8217;s Universe/Gem Uncirculated 2001 Silver Eagles slabbed as 1 of 1000 coins.  Conclusion?  Could there be TWO separate 1 of 1000 sets?!! (one with PCGS MS69 slabbed coins and one with Collectors Universe/Gem Uncirculated slabbed coins?)</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.wtc911coins.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.wtc911coins.com/1099/pcgs-error-on-slabs-from-wtc/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wtc911coins.com/?p=1099#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Hi Jacob,

Was looking over your site and discovered another case where cert verification can give us a more detailed picture about populations.

Since you were good enough to show a picture of the BACK of one of the MS69 1 of 1000 silver Eagle coins, I had a seed number to revisit PCGS&#039;s cert verification site and &quot;dig&quot;.  Turns out there are exactly 500 identical $1 Silver eagles (consecutive Cert #&#039;s 71239453 to 71239952) which your coin picture number 71239886 falls within.  Since it&#039;s identified as a &quot;1 of 1000&quot; coin, I would presume half were slabbed as &quot;Collector&#039;s Univers/Gem Uncirculated&quot; and the other half were slabbed as &quot;PCGS with Verification Numbers&quot;.  Maybe the owner of the coins requested this.  Could it be that PCGS charged less for CU/GU slabbing than they did for Number grading?  If so, mightened the owner say, just slab half with grading and half without, possibly to save money?  I think it&#039;s interesting that exactly half got graded as a bulk submission, don&#039;t you?

Anyone who thinks PCGS doesn&#039;t have detailed records of this stuff is crazy, because look at what we can find through the &quot;back door&quot;!

Ross</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacob,</p>
<p>Was looking over your site and discovered another case where cert verification can give us a more detailed picture about populations.</p>
<p>Since you were good enough to show a picture of the BACK of one of the MS69 1 of 1000 silver Eagle coins, I had a seed number to revisit PCGS&#8217;s cert verification site and &#8220;dig&#8221;.  Turns out there are exactly 500 identical $1 Silver eagles (consecutive Cert #&#8217;s 71239453 to 71239952) which your coin picture number 71239886 falls within.  Since it&#8217;s identified as a &#8220;1 of 1000&#8243; coin, I would presume half were slabbed as &#8220;Collector&#8217;s Univers/Gem Uncirculated&#8221; and the other half were slabbed as &#8220;PCGS with Verification Numbers&#8221;.  Maybe the owner of the coins requested this.  Could it be that PCGS charged less for CU/GU slabbing than they did for Number grading?  If so, mightened the owner say, just slab half with grading and half without, possibly to save money?  I think it&#8217;s interesting that exactly half got graded as a bulk submission, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Anyone who thinks PCGS doesn&#8217;t have detailed records of this stuff is crazy, because look at what we can find through the &#8220;back door&#8221;!</p>
<p>Ross</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

